Analisis Penggunaan Maklum Balas Pembetulan Bertulis Bahasa Arab Secara Elektronik dalam Kalangan Pensyarah dan Pelajar Universiti di Malaysia
Usage Analysis of Written Electronic Corrective Feedback Among Arabic Lecturers and Students of A Malaysian University
Keywords:
Maklum balas pembetulan, penulisan kolaboratif, pengajaran bahasa Arab, kemahiran penulisan, e-pembelajaranAbstract
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji pilihan dan justifikasi pensyarah dan pelajar ketika memberikan dan menerima maklum balas pembetulan bertulis melalui aplikasi Google Doc dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa Arab di Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia. Dua soal selidik telah diadaptasi dan diedarkan kepada 93 orang pelajar yang mengambil kursus Penulisan Akademik dalam bahasa Arab. Empat orang pensyarah yang mengajar kursus tersebut juga turut menjawab soal selidik yang diberikan. Temu bual semi-struktur dijalankan ke atas dua orang pensyarah dan lima orang pelajar bagi mengenalpasti justifikasi di sebalik pemilihan jenis maklum balas. Analisis deskriptif bagi data kuantitatif pula dibuat menggunakan perisian SPSS manakala analisis tematik menggunakan Atlas.ti digunakan untuk menganalisis temu bual. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa pensyarah memilih maklum balas pembetulan bertulis secara tidak langsung dengan komen metalinguistik manakala pelajar pula memilih maklum balas pembetulan bertulis secara langsung dengan komen metalinguistik. Antara penjelasan yang diberikan oleh pensyarah adalah maklum balas yang dipilih kerana dapat membentuk kemahiran kognitif pelajar dan bebanan kerja yang banyak manakala pelajar pula berpandangan mereka tiada keyakinan diri untuk memperbetulkan kesalahan sendiri dan kekangan masa untuk mencari jawapan yang dilakukan dalam penulisan. Pendekatan pedagogi juga dicadangkan bagi membantu pelajar dan pensyarah bahasa Arab menggunakan Google Doc dalam menerima dan memberi maklum balas pembetulan bertulis.
Downloads
References
Abu Seileek, Ali & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using Peer Computer-Mediated Corrective Feedback To Support Efl Learners ’ Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76–95. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4cbe/66be221033c5cbb67de409b6059335ed3780.pdf
AbuSeileek, Ali & Al-Olimat, S. I. (2015). Using computer-mediated corrective feedback modes in developing students' writing peformance. The Jounal of Teaching English with Technology, 15 (3), 3-30.
Almasi, Elham & Tabrizi, A.R.N. (2016). The effects of direct vs indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners' writing accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 74-85.
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback : What do students and teachers prefer and why ? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics., 13(2), 95–127. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ944129.pdf
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1-English and L2- Writing Development: A Meta-analysis. TOEFL iBT TM Research Report.
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Black, D. A., & Nanni, A. (2016). Written Corrective Feedback : Preferences and Justifications of Teachers and Students in a Thai Context. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(October), 99–114. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10164/1/12949-45005-1-PB.pdf
Chen, S., Nassaji, H. & Liu, Q (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ. 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
Daphnée Simard, Danièle Guénette & Annie Bergeron (2015) L2 learners' interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflections, Language Awareness, 24:3, 233-254, DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432
Dara Tafazoli, Heidar Nosratzadeh & Nouriehossadat Hosseini (2014). Computer-mediated corrective feedback in ESP courses: Reducing grammatical errors via email. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 355-359.
Diez-Bedmar, M. B., & Perez-Paredes, P. (2012). The Types and Effects of Peer Native Speakers’ Feedback on CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 62–90. http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2761
Ebadi, E. (2014). The effect of focused meta-linguistic written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL Learners' essay writing ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 878-883. http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol05/04/19.pdf
Elham Daneshvar & Ali Rahimi (2014). Written corrective feedback and teaching grammar. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 217-221.
Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Eslami, Elham (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students' writing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445-452.
Eun Young Kang (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99 (1), 1-18.
Eun Sung Park, Sunhee Song & Yu Kyoung Shin (2016). To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study targeting learners of different proficiency and heritage language status. Language Teaching Research, 20 (6), 678-699.
Frear, D. & Chiu, Y.H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners' accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24-34.
Fuente, M. J. (2016). Explicit corrective feedback and computer-based, form-focused instruction: The role of L1 in promoting awareness of L2 forms. In A Psycholinguistic Approach to Technology and Language Learning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hamel, M. J., Slavkov, N., Inkpen, D., & Xiao, D. (2016). MyAnnotator: A tool for technology-mediated written corrective feedback. TAL, 57(3), 119-142. http://www.atala.org/sites/default/files/MyAnnotator_June_2017NS.pdf
Heift, T & Hegelheimer, V. (2017). Computer-assisted corrective feedback. In Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Helen, B. (2013). Designing for active learning in technology-rich contexts. In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning.United Kingdom: Routledge.
Hosseini, Seyyed Behrooz (2012). Asynchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback and the correct use of prepositions: Is it really effective? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13 (4), 95-111.
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/63bb/1c63c2adfc1e661c2e14866b0b87f13eee58.pdf
Karim, K. & Nassaji, H. (2020). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students' writing. Language Teaching Research, 24 (4).
Laurel, W. & Mostafa, P. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers' motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54-65.
Lee, A.H., & Lyster, R. (2017). Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 371-393.
Mansourizadeh, K., Abdullah, K. I. (2014) The Effects of Oral and Written Metalinguistic Feedback on ESL Students Writing. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(3), 117-126.
Mohd Azrul Azlen Abd Hamid., Nuraihan Mat Daud., & Norshidrah Mat Daud. (2014). Developing Arabic Writing Skills : Peer Feedback in Online Forum Facility on Moodle. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 20, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.lcl.208
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 The Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah Journal (JSASS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
