The Myth of Partition
Keywords:India, Pakistan, Partition, Migration, Settlement
The partition of Sub-Continent was not a customary occasion. It is critical that it was the immense movement of the twentieth century. Notwithstanding it, it is similarly imperative that this movement denoted the best viciousness the history at any point saw. It was the territory of Punjab that was experienced most extreme viciousness "seventy five percent of a million executed", and it had been evaluated that more than ten million Punjabis were evacuated from their countries. As per a gauge 12– 15 million individuals were persuasively exchanged between the two nations i.e India and Pakistan. The religious daze caused the passing of 2 million Muslims and Non-Muslims. No less than 75,000 ladies were assaulted. Thus, all the provincial and urban regions in the Punjab were overwhelmingly altered by the statistic disturbance. The settlement of uprooted people started from 1947. After the departure of Non-Muslims, concurrent relocation of Muslims got quickened from East Punjab. The main obstacles in the method for Muslim outcasts were the absence of convenience and also that of work. On account of the accessibility of work to them, they were not sufficiently gifted to win a vocation. Utilizing the scientific strategy and using the analytical methodology the prime centralization of this investigation was to plug this missing fragment, which would grow the learning of relocation and settlement.
Ahmad, I. (2002). The 1947 Partition of India: A Paradighm for Pathological Politics in India and Pakistan. Asian Ethncity , 09.
Ahmad, N. (1953). The Indo-Pakistan Boundary Dispute Tribunal, 1949-1950. Geographical Review , 329.
Bianchini, S. (2005). Partitions: Reshaping States and Minds. Oxon: Abingdon Press.
Boswell, C. (2008). Combining Economics and Sociology in Migration Theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migratin Studies , 550.
Brettell, C., & Hollifield, J. F. (2014). Migration Theory: Talking Across Disciplines. Routledge , 12.
Cheema, P. I. (2000). The Politics of the Punjab Boundary Award. South Asia Institute Department of Political Science Working , 19.
Christiane, & Hartnack. (2012). Roots adn Routes: The Partition of British India inIndian Social Memories. Journal of Historical Sociology , 244.
Cohen, S. P. (2002). The Nation and teh State of Pakistan. Washington Quarterly , 110.
hussain, r. (1985). in the name of allah. asian studies , 256-696.
Krishan. (1983). Mountbatten adn teh Partition of India. Oxford University Press , 68.
Langah, N. t. (2011). Call for Siraiki Province. Forum of Federations and Centre for Civic Education Pakistan , 09.
Leader. (1947). Quoted Mehrotra. Congress and Partition , 220.
Lee, E. (1966). A Theory of Migration . Demography , 49.
Majid, A. (2014). Genesis of the Two Nations Theory and the Quaid-e-Azam . Pakistan Vision , 190.
Moore. (1983). Jinnah adn the Pakistan Demand. Modern Asian Studies , 529.
Naumana, K. (2008). Class-Structure and Social Stratification in Early Muslim India(1206-1526). Journal of Research Society of Pakistan , 169.
Rabbani, A. (2010). Jinnah through my Eyes. Lahore: Ferozeson.
Roberts, A. (2010). Eminent Churchillian. London: Allied Publishers.
Roy, A. (1990). The High Politics of India's Partition: The Revisionist Perspective the High Politics of Indian's Partition: The Revisionist Perspective. Modern Asian Studies , 404.
Sankar, G. (1993). Jawaharlal Nehru, A Biography. New Delhi: Allied Publisher.
Shani, G. (2007). Two Nations. International Affairs , 71.
Singh, S., & Gill, M. S. (2009). Social and Psychological Trauma of the Displaced: A Study of Partition of India. Asi-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences , 02.
UmarAli, R. (2012). Empire in Retreat: The Story of Indian's Partition. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Yusin, J. (2009). The Silence of Partition: Border, Trauma, and Partition History. Social Semiotics , 453-469
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.